The Supreme Court eventually heard a set of challenges relating to the involuntary administration of narco analysis, polygraph examinations and Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) tests.
Daily Current Affairs Quiz 2020
Key-Points
The judgment in Smt. Selvi vs State of Karnataka observed that involuntary administration of these scientific tests was “sufficient to constitute a custodial environment”. It amounted to a “restraint on personal liberty”.
The consequences of such tests on “individuals from weaker sections of society who are unaware of their fundamental rights and unable to afford legal advice” can be devastating.
It may involve future abuse, harassment and surveillance, even leakage of the video material to the Press for a “trial by media.”
Such tests are an affront to human dignity and liberty, and have long-lasting effects.
An individual’s decision to make a statement is the product of a private choice and there should be no scope for any other individual to interfere with such autonomy.
