UGC NET(National Eligibility Test) Law - Previous Years Solved Papers | Paper III November 2017
(a) Preamble
(b) Fundamental Rights
(c) Directive Principles of State Policy
(d) Fundamental Duties
Code :- (1) (a) and (b) are correct
- (2) (a) and (c) are correct
- (3) (b) and (c) are correct
- (4) (b), (c) and (d) are correct
Answer: (2)
(a) Union of India v. N.S. Rathnam and others
(b) Basawaraj v. Special Land Acqisition Officer
(c) Usha Mehta v. Government of A.P
(d) City Industrial Development v. Platinum Entertainment
Code :- (1) (c), (b), (d), (a)
- (2) (b), (c), (d), (a)
- (3) (d), (b), (c), (a)
- (4) (b), (c), (a), (d)
Answer: (1)
⭐ Make GKSeries Your Preferred Source on Google
Add GKSeries as Preferred SourceAssertion (A) : The Constitution of India under Article 40 states that The State shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as units of self government.
Reason (R) : This directive gives an assurance that every village where maximum people live, has to be made an autonomous republic, self-sufficient, self-sustaining and capable of managing its own affairs.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is true but (R) is false
- (4) (A) is false but (R) is true
Answer: (1)
(a) Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District Judge selection process held in “Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High court of Judicature at Patna” by the Supreme Court of India
(b) The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim education society that “All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged
(c) The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardamom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
(d) The Supreme Court of India held in ‘Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court Judges are exempted from Airport frisking.
Code :- (1) Only (b) is correct
- (2) (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (3) (b), (c) and (d) are correct
- (4) (a), (b) and (d) are correct
Answer: (2)
- (1) Art 118........Duration of parliament
- (2) Art 119........Restriction on discussion in Parliament
- (3) Art 120........Language to be used in Parliament
- (4) Art 121........courts not to inquire into the Proceedings of Parliament
Answer: (3)

- (1) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (2) (iv) (ii) (i) (iii)
- (3) (iii) (ii) (iv) (i)
- (4) (ii) (iii) (i) (iv)
Answer: (2)
(a) Prior permission of President is required before introducing the constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament
(b) Constitutional Amendment Bill can be introduced in either House of Parliament.
(c) President is bound to give his assent to the Bill if duly passed by both Houses of Parliament and ratified, if required, by the Legislatures of not less than one - half of the States
(d) President may return the Bill to the Houses for reconsideration
Code :- (1) Only (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (2) Only (b) and (c) are correct
- (3) Only (b), (c) and (d) are correct
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) all are correct
Answer: (2)

- (1) (iii) (i) (ii) (iv)
- (2) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (3) (ii) (iv) (i) (iii)
- (4) (iv) (ii) (iii) (i)
Answer: (1)
- (1) 17TH century
- (2) 18TH century
- (3) 19TH century
- (4) 20TH century
Answer: (4)
Assertion (A) : Natural justice is justice of the nature where the lion devours the lamb and the tiger feeds upon the antilope
Reason (R) : Above statement is taken from Union of India V. Tulsiram Patel Code :
- (1) Both (A) and (R) are correct
- (2) (A) is correct, but (R) is incorrect
- (3) (R) is correct, but (A) is incorrect
- (4) Both (A) and (R) are incorrect
Answer: (4)
- (1) State of U.P. v. Vijay Kumar Tripathi
- (2) P. Satyanarayana v. Land Reforms Tribunal
- (3) I.T.C. v. State of Madras
- (4) Manjula Manjari Devi v. Director of Public Instruction
Answer: (1)

- (1) (ii) (iv) (iii) (i)
- (2) (iii) (iv) (ii) (i)
- (3) (i) (iii) (iv) (ii)
- (4) (iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
Answer: (2)
(a) Ultra vires the law
(b) Mala fide intent
(c) Arbitrariness
(d) Irrelevant considerations
Code :- (1) (a) and (b) are correct
- (2) (b) and (c) are correct
- (3) (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) are correct
Answer: (4)
- (1) Indian Rly. Construction Co. Ltd v. Ajay Kumar
- (2) A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India
- (3) Union of India v. Bashyan
- (4) Rajesh Kumar v. C.I.T.
Answer: (2)
- (1) A member of Parliament
- (2) A member of State Legislature
- (3) A retired High Court judge
- (4) A retired Chief Justice of a High Court
Answer: (4)
- (1) Keeton
- (2) Blackston
- (3) Cardozo
- (4) Paton
Answer: (3)
- (1) Emmanuel Kant
- (2) John Rawls
- (3) Jeremy Benthem
- (4) Stammeler
Answer: (3)

- (1) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (2) (ii) (iii) (iv) (i)
- (3) (iii) (ii) (iv) (i)
- (4) (ii) (iv) (iii) (i)
Answer: (2)
- (1) Supreme legislation
- (2) Subordinate legislation
- (3) Colonial legislation
- (4) Precedent
Answer: (4)
- (1) Savigny
- (2) Ehrlich
- (3) Henry Main
- (4) Hegel
Answer: (2)
Reason (R) : An element of advantage is essential to constitute right
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are right and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are right and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is right but (R) is wrong
- (4) (R) is right but (A) is wrong
Answer: (3)

- (1) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (2) (iii) (iv) (ii) (i)
- (3) (i) (iv) (ii) (iii)
- (4) (iii) (ii) (iv) (i)
Answer: (2)

- (1) (iii) (i) (ii) (iv)
- (2) (i) (iii) (ii) (iv)
- (3) (iii) (i) (iv) (ii)
- (4) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
Answer: (3)
- (1) Nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege
- (2) Perils of his life and liberty on refusal of bail
- (3) Simple Principles based on corrective law
- (4) To avoid purposeless cruelty
Answer: (1)
- (1) It does not allow a preventive action because an act of conspiracy is derived when the crime results
- (2) It dispenses the difficult requirement of proximity in attempt
- (3) The momentum justifies punishment
- (4) The object is simply to make of a crime
Answer: (2)
- (1) Disapprobation of the government
- (2) Excite disrespect against government
- (3) Commenting on administrative actions of the government
- (4) Attempting to excite disaffection against government
Answer: (3)
- (1) When it is discharged in good faith
- (2) When it is attempted to be done by him
- (3) When it was done while he was not in his office
- (4) When it is strictly to be justifiable by law
Answer: (2)
- (1) The previous conviction must have been for not less than 3 years of imprisonment
- (2) The subsequent offence is not punishable with imprisonment for more than 3 years
- (3) The offence must be an offence relating to property or coin or government stamp
- (4) The previous conviction was not in India
Answer: (3)
- (1) Every person is considered to be sane unless contrary is proved
- (2) When a criminal act is performed during derrangement
- (3) When the cognitive facilities are such that he does not know what he has done
- (4) Non - serene memory not from birth
Answer: (3)
- (1) Circumscribing limits
- (2) Malice
- (3) Moral force
- (4) Mistaken exercise of power
Answer: (2)
- (1) A publisher is responsible for publishing a defamatory statement for first time only and not for repeating it
- (2) Only editor and not printer and publisher are responsible for that defamatory statement in the newspaper
- (3) Defamatory imputation concerning any person may be conveyed obliquely or indirectly, or by way of question, conjecture, exclamation or by irony
- (4) The court does not distinguish between “character” and “reputation” for fixing liability against defamation
Answer: (3)
Assertion (A) : Redemption of the damaged environment is a part of the process of sustainable development and as such polluter in liable to pay the cost of the individual sufferers as well as the cost of reversing the damaged ecology
Reason (R) : “Polluter pays principle” is part of the environmental jurisprudence of this country
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is true but (R) is false
- (4) (A) is false but (R) is true
Answer: (1)
- (1) Principle of sustainable development
- (2) No state has a right to use or permit the use of its territory so as to cause injury by fumes in the territory of another
- (3) Redemption of the damaged environment is a part of the process of sustainable development
- (4) Placing a duty on the State to hold environmental resources in trust for the benefit of public
Answer: (2)

- (1) (i) (iii) (iv) (ii)
- (2) (iv) (ii) (i) (iii)
- (3) (ii) (iv) (i) (iii)
- (4) (iii) (ii) (i) (iv)
Answer: (3)
- (1) Every person enjoys the right to a wholesome environment which is a facet of the right to life guaranteed under Art 21 of the Constitution of India
- (2) The power confered under an Environmental Statute may be exercised only to advance Environment Protection and not for a purpose that would defeat the object of the law
- (3) Financial constraints of the government may be a reasonable factor to exonorate the Government/Municipal bodies from performing its statutory liability
- <(4)Precautionary principle imposes the onus of proof on the developer to show his or her action is environmentally benign/li>
Answer: (3)
- (1) Indian Council for Enviro Legal Action v. Union of India
- (2) Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardichand
- (3) M.C. Metha v. Union of India
- (4) T.N. Godavarman Thimmulpaad v. Union of India
Answer: (3)
- (1) By passing a resolution in the Parliament
- (2) By passing a resolution in the Legislature of a State
- (3) By passing a resolution both in the Parliament and State Legislature
- (4) By passing a resolution in the Municipal Body and State Legislature
Answer: (2)
- (1) International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
- (2) The control of transboundary movements of Hazardous Wastes and their disposal
- (3) Climate Change
- (4) Protection of the ozone layer
Answer: (2)
(a) Habbes
(b) Pufendorf
(c) Oppenheim
(d) Starke
Code :- (1) Only (a)
- (2) Both (a) and (b)
- (3) (a), (b) and (c)
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) all
Answer: (2)
- (1) Nicaragua v. U.S.A
- (2) Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v. Mali)
- (3) Portugal v. India
- (4) Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear
Answer: (1)
- (1) Oppenheim
- (2) Lauterpacht
- (3) Philip C. Jessup
- (4) Anzilloti
Answer: (2)
(a) In Nottelohm’s case the International Court of Justice held that in respect of grant of nationality there is no obligation of the states if that man has no relationship with the State of Naturalisation
(b) In famous Re lynch case it was held that if a person is not a citizen of any state he will be called Stateless
(c) Nationality is the principal link between an individual and international law
(d) The Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness was adopted in 1959 by the General Assembly
Code :- (1) Only (a) is correct
- (2) (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (3) (b), (c) and (d) are correct
- (4) (a) and (c) both are correct
Answer: (4) 43. Read both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer by using the code given below :
Assertion (A) : It is a very important principle of International Law that extradition for political crimes is not allowed.
Reason (R) : Stoeck v. The Public Trustee is a leading case relating to non - extradition of political criminals.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A
- (3) (A) is correct but (R) is wrong
- (4) (A) is wrong but (R) is correct
Answer: (3)
(a) United Nations Declaration on Territorial Asylum was unanimously adopted in 1977 by the General Assembly
(b) Article 14 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights makes obligatory by states to grant Asylum
(c) The international court of justice explained the distinction between ‘Territorial asylum’ and ‘diplomatic asylum’ in the Colombia v. Perus
(d) The Convention on the status of Refugees, 1951 entered into force on April 22, 1954
Code :- (1) Only (a) is not correct
- (2) (a) and (d) are not correct
- (3) (a), (b) and (c) all are not correct
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) all are not correct
Answer: (3)
(a) The General Assembly consists of all the members of the United Nations. Each member may not have not more than five representatives in the General Assembly
(b) China, Russia, America, Britain and Italy are the permanent members of the security Council
(c) The members of the Economic and Social Council are elected by the security council, one - third of its members are elected every year by the security council for a term of five years
(d) All members of the United Nations are ipso facto the members of the Statute of International Court of Justice
Code :- (1) Only (a) and (d) are correct
- (2) (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (3) (b), (c) and (d) are correct
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) all are correct
Answer: (1)
- (1) On the request of Security Council only
- (2) On the request of the General Assembly only
- (3) On the request of General Assembly or the Security Council both
- (4) On the request of the Economic and Social Council if authorised by the Security Council
Answer: (3)
Assertion (A) : In Mithila, a widow cannot adopt at all, not even if she has the express authority of her husband.
Reason (R) : A widow may adopt under the authority from her husband.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is not correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is correct but (R) is false
- (4) (A) is false but (R) is correct
Answer: (1)
- (1) Moraka Properties v. Biharilal Moraka
- (2) Union of India v. Sree Ram Bohra
- (3) Nopany Investment v. Santosh Singh
- (4) Commissioner of Income Tax v. Govindram Sugar Mills
Answer: (1)
- (1) Shah Bano case
- (2) Bai Tahira case
- (3) Shamim Ara case
- (4) Sarabai case
Answer: (4)
- (1) Father’s custody of child
- (2) Brother’s custody of child
- (3) Mother’s custody of child
- (4) Sister’s custody of child
Answer: (3)

- (1) (iii) (iv) (i) (ii)
- (2) (i) (iii) (ii) (iv)
- (3) (iii) (ii) (i) (iv)
- (4) (ii) (iv) (iii) (i)
Answer: (1)
Assertion (A) : ‘Option of Puberty’ is an easy process to repudiate the marriage under Hindu Law.
Reason (R) : “Option of Puberty” is not an easy process to repudiate the marriage under Muslim Law.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is correct (R) is false
- (4) (A) is false (R) is correct
Answer: (2)
- (1) Shia Schools
- (2) Hanafi School
- (3) Shafai School
- (4) Maliki School
Answer: (4)
- (1) Valid
- (2) Voidable
- (3) Void
- (4) Neither valid nor void or no talaq
Answer: (4)
- (1) Life, Liberty, Equality and Dignity
- (2) Life, Equality, Liberty and Dignity
- (3) Life, Equality, Dignity and Liberty
- (4) Life, Liberty, Dignity and Equality
Answer: (1)
- (1) Sec 3......Appointment of chairperson and other members
- (2) Sec 4......Removal of a member of the commission
- (3) Sec 5......Member to act as chairperson in certain times
- (4) Sec 6......Term of office of members
Answer: (4)
- (1) Justice S. Rajendra Babu - 02.04.2007 to 31.05.2009
- (2) Justice K.G. Bala Krishnan - 07.06.2010 to 11.05.2015
- (3) Justice Ms.M. Fathima Beevi- 03.11.1993 to 24.01.1997
- (4) Justice V.S. Malimat - 05.08.1994 to 12.10.1998
Answer: (4)

- (1) (iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
- (2) (iv) (i) (ii) (iii)
- (3) (ii) (iv) (i) (iii)
- (4) (iii) (iv) (i) (ii)
Answer: (1)
(a) Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of Children in Armed Conflict was adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by the United Nations General Assembly resolution 54/263 of 25 May, 2000
(b) Worst forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No.182) was adopted on 15 June, 1999 by the General Conference of the International Labour Organisation at its eighty - seventh session
(c) Minimum Age Convention, 1973 (No. 138) was adopted on 26 August, 1973 by the General Conference of the International Labour Organisation at its Fifty Eighth session
(d) Convention on the Rights of the Child was adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by the United Nations General Council Resolution 44/25 of 20 November, 1989
Code :- (1) (a), (b) and (c) are incorrect
- (2) (b), (c) and (d) are incorrect
- (3) (a) and (b) are incorrect
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) all are incorrect
Answer: (2)
- (1) Karel Vasak
- (2) Charles O. Lee
- (3) Maurice Cranston
- (4) Frederic Bastial
Answer: (1)
(a) Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samiti v. State of West Bengal
(b) Paramananda Katara v. Union of India
(c) Social Jurists v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
(d) Sahara House v. Union of India
Code :- (1) (b), (a), (c), (d)
- (2) (d), (a), (b), (c)
- (3) (b), (d), (c), (a)
- (4) (c), (d), (a), (b)
Answer: (1)
(a) The principle was approved except as to quantum of damages in Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India
(b) The principle in determining compensation was applied in Union Carbide Corporation v. Union of India
(c) The compensation to be awarded must have some broad correlation not only with magnitude and capacity of the enterprise but also with the harm caused by it was held in Deepak Nitrite v. State of Gujrat.
(d) The principle is not followed in India because Parliament could not pass yet Public Liability Insurance Bill, 1991
Code :- (1) Only (a) is correct
- (2) (a) and (b) are correct
- (3) (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) are correct
Answer: (3)
- (1) Defamation published in permanent form - Slander
- (2) Libel is recognized as offence - England
- (3) Truth of defamatory matter is no defence - Civil law
- (4) Action lies for defamatory statement - Absolute Privilege
Answer: (2)
Assertion (A) : The existence of a duty to take care is essential before a person can be held liable in negligence.
Reason (R) : The standard of care required is not a matter of law and does vary according to the individuals although it does not vary according to the circumstances.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is right but (R) is wrong
- (4) (A) is wrong but (R) is right
Answer: (3)

- (1) (iii) (ii) (iv) (i)
- (2) (ii) (iv) (iii) (i)
- (3) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
- (4) (iv) (iii) (ii) (i)
Answer: (4)
Assertion (A) : According to the ‘law of tort’ every wrongful act for which there is no justification or excuse to be treated as a tort.
Reason (R) : Theory of ‘pigeon - hole’ was propounded by Salmond.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
- (3) (A) is right but (R) is wrong
- (4) (A) is wrong but (R) is right
Answer: (2)
- (1) Only in derogation of other law
- (2) No addition to other law
- (3) Not in addition and in derogation of other law
- (4) In addition to and not in derogation of other law
Answer: (4)
(a) Ordinarily grant no adjournment unless sufficient cause
(b) To impose costs occasioned by adjournment
(c) Record the reason for delay while disposing of the appeal
(d) Dispose of the appeal ex parte
Code :- (1) (a) and (b) are correct
- (2) (a), (b) and (c) are correct
- (3) (a), (b) and (d) are correct
- (4) (b), (c) and (d) are correct
Answer: (2)
Assertion (A) : Where a bill is unintentionally cancelled by the holder or his agent and the cancellation is not apparent thereon, the bill is discharged.
Reason (R) : Above principle is laid down in Section 82 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are wrong
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are right
- (3) (A) is right but (R) is wrong
- (4) (A) is wrong but (R) is right
Answer: (1)

- (1) (iii) (i) (iv) (ii)
- (2) (i) (iii) (iv) (ii)
- (3) (iii) (i) (ii) (iv)
- (4) (iv) (ii) (i) (iii)
Answer: (1)

- (1) (i) (iv) (ii) (iii)
- (2) (iv) (i) (ii) (iii)
- (3) (iv) (i) (iii) (ii)
- (4) (ii) (iii) (i) (iv)
Answer: (2)
Assertion (A) : “Goods” means every kind of movable property including actionable claims and money and excludes stock and shares, growing crops, grass and things attached to or forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.
Reason (R) : Above principle is laid down in Section 2 (7) of the Sale of Goods Act.
Code :- (1) Both (A) and (R) are right
- (2) Both (A) and (R) are wrong
- (3) (A) is wrong but, (R) is right
- (4) (A) is right but, (R) is wrong
Answer: (2)
- (1) Notwithstanding any express contract the seller of goods is not bound to deliver them until the buyer applies for delivery
- (2) Apart from any express contract, the seller of goods is not bound to deliver them until the buyer applies for delivery
- (3) Apart from any express contract the seller of goods is bound to deliver them until the buyer applies for deliver
- (4) Apart from any express contract, the buyer of goods is bound to deliver them when the seller applies for delivery
Answer: (2)
(a) Ferguson v. Wilson
(b) Elkington and Co. v. Harter
(c) Hampshire Land Co, re
(d) Allen v. Hyatt
Code :- (1) Only (a)
- (2) Only (a) and (b)
- (3) Only (a), (b) and (c)
- (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d)
Answer: (4)
- (1) Royal British Bank v.Turquand
- (2) Premier Industrial Bank Ltd. v. Carlton Mfg. Co. Ltd.
- (3) Rajendra Nath Dutta v. Shibendra Nath Mukherjee
- (4) Attorney General v. Great Eastern Railway Co.
Answer: (4)